­

6. Concerning the Church:   Articles 19-22

19. About the Church

Original: The visible Church of Christ is a congregation of faithful men, in the which the pure Word of God is preached, and the Sacraments be duly- ministered according to Christ's ordinance in all those things that of necessity are requisite to the same.  As the Church of Jerusalem, Alexandria, and Antioch, have erred; so also the Church of Rome hath erred, not only in their living and manner of Ceremonies, but also in matters of Faith.

Simple English: The visible Church of Christ is a congregation of faithful people, in which the pure Word of God is preached, and the sacraments are rightly administered according to everything that Christ's ordinance requires. As the Church of Jerusalem, Alexandria, and Antioch, have gone astray; so also the Church of Rome has gone astray, not only in their living and manner of ceremonies, but also in matters of faith.

The Anglican Church defines the church in a different way to that of the Roman Catholic Church. The Article does not refer to a church structure or organization. It follows the teaching of the New Testament and describes the church as a congregation. It is an assembly gathered together to hear the Word of God and to administer the sacraments.

The Article refers to the visible church. In the New Testament the term church usually means a local group of Christians in one place.  The Articles uses the term church in this sense. The other main use of the term church in the New Testament is in relation to the heavenly or eternal church. This is the church assembled around Jesus in heaven (see Heb 12.22-24; Eph 1.22; Col 1.18 etc).

The Article states that the things that define the true church of Christ are  that:

  • it is a congregation, a fellowship which meets together;
  • it is made up of people who faithfully follow Christ
  • the pure Word of God  is preached, not the Word of God mixed with other ideas
  • the sacraments are rightly administered.

The Article does not describe the character of a national church. Article 34 adds other ideas about national churches. This Article does assert that the Roman Church has gone astray in matters of faith as well as ceremonies. This probably refers to doctrines and practices to do with the Mass, justification and purgatory, amongst others.

20. About the Authority of the Church

Original: The Church hath power to decree Rites or Ceremonies, and authority- in Controversies of Faith: And yet it is not lawful for the Church to ordain anything that is contrary to God's Word written, neither may it so expound one place of Scripture, that it be repugnant to another. Wherefore, although the Church be a witness and a keeper of Holy Writ, as it ought not to decree anything against the same, so besides the same ought it not to enforce any thing to be believed for necessity of Salvation.

Simple English: The Church has power to order rites or ceremonies, and has authority in controversies of faith. But it is not lawful for the Church to establish anything that is contrary to God's Word written, neither may it expound one place of Scripture so that it disagrees with another. The Church is a witness and a keeper of Holy Scripture, and since it ought not to decree anything against the scripture, neither should it force belief in anything additional to the scripture as necessary for salvation.

The first sentence of this Article was possibly written by Queen Elizabeth I. Henry VIII had declared himself  to be the Supreme authority in the Church of England, and Queen Elizabeth did not want the church to have more authority than was appropriate. So the Article limits the authority of the church to matters of faith and ceremonies. Articles 34 and 37 say more about this.

The authority of the church is also limited by Scripture. In fact the Article uses two different words. The authority in matters of faith is less than the power to make laws about ceremonies. This is because the real authority in matters of faith is the Bible. The church is not the creator or master of scripture, but must obey what scripture teaches.

The Article also describes the relationship between the church and the individual. The church cannot compel belief in anything that contradicts scripture, or that is an addition to the scripture.

21. About the Authority of General Councils

Original: General Councils may not be gathered together without the commandment and will of Princes. And when they be gathered together, (forasmuch as they be an assembly of men, whereof all be not governed with the Spirit and Word of God,) they may err, and sometimes have erred, even in things pertaining unto God. Wherefore things ordained by them as necessary to salvation have neither strength nor authority, unless it may be declared that they be taken out of Holy Scripture.

Simple English: General Councils may not be gathered together without the command and will of Rulers. And when they are gathered together, (because they are an assembly of humans, not all of whom are governed by the Spirit and Word of God,) they may go astray, and sometimes have gone astray, even in things concerning God. Therefore things decided by them as necessary to salvation have neither strength nor authority, unless it can be shown that they are taken out of Holy Scripture.

The General Councils referred to in this Article include the great Councils of Nicea, Constantinople and Chalcedon as well as many other Councils called by different emperors or popes.  The term General Council means a council representing the whole church, not just a council of the church of one nation, or of bishops in communion with the Pope.  At the time when there were three popes the Council of Constance resolved the problem (1415), but then Pope Pius II who had been elected by that council issued a decree forbidding appeals to a General Council. This meant that the Pope had a higher authority than General Councils. But Councils were still held and were used to approve new doctrines by the Roman Church. The most significant was the Council of Trent which met on three occasions from 1545 until 1563.

This Article places the authority of Councils below the authority of Scripture. It also states that Councils must be called by rulers as the great early Councils were. Therefore it denied the right of the Pope to call a Council.

22. About Purgatory

Original: The Romish Doctrine concerning Purgatory, Pardons, Worshipping and Adoration, as well of Images as of Reliques, and also invocation of Saints, is a fond thing vainly invented, and grounded upon no warranty of Scripture, but rather repugnant to the Word of God.

Simple English: The Roman Catholic doctrine concerning purgatory, pardons, worshipping and adoration of  images as well as relics, and  praying to Saints, is a silly thing invented for no good reason, and based on no assurance of Scripture, but rather opposed by the Word of God.

The content of this Article is greater than the title suggests. It mentions four things which the Anglican church considers to be contrary to scripture.

Purgatory: Ideas about purgatory had been discussed as early as the 6th century.  The idea was that punishments (not eternal punishment) for certain sins which had not been completed in this life, could be purged in an intermediate state. The Council of Florence in 1439 and later the Council of Trent both said such a state existed.

Pardons: Pardons (or indulgences) allow a person to be forgiven part of the punishment for sins committed in this life. These punishments were often different kinds of penances. But if a person died who had not yet completed all the punishments, it was possible that the amount of purging that remained in purgatory could be reduced by these pardons issued by the Pope.

Worshipping Images and Relics: The remains  of famous Christians were thought to help by allowing a  person to gain some merit from the holy person. Showing respect to images of Saints was also thought to be a way of gaining merit. It was connected to praying to saints.

Praying to Saints: The Anglican church teaches that we do not need to ask dead Christians  to pray for us, nor to seek their help. Indeed such prayers are against the doctrine that Christ is our only mediator between us and God.

7. Concerning The Ministry:  Articles 23-24

23. About Ministering in the Congregation

Original: It is not lawful for any man to take upon him the office of publick preaching, or ministering the Sacraments in the Congregation, before he be lawfully called, and sent to execute the same. And those we ought to judge lawfully called and sent, which be chosen and called to this work by men who have publick authority given unto them in the Congregation, to call and send Ministers into the Lord's vineyard.

Simple English: It is not lawful for anyone to take upon themselves the office of public preaching, or ministering the sacraments in the congregation, before they are lawfully called and sent to do it. Those whom we ought to regard as lawfully called and sent, are those who are chosen and called to this work by people who have been given public authority in the Church to call and send ministers into the Lord's vineyard.

The Article explains that public ministry in the church should be done only by authorised ministers. The Anglican church rejected the views of those (eg some Anabaptists) who claimed that ministry could be done by anyone who had divine anointing.  However the Article only applies to public ministry, it does not apply to private ministry.

The Article also focuses on the two areas of church life which the Anglican church thinks are most important:, ie the ministries of preaching and sacraments (see Article 19). The question about ordination and the kinds and orders of ministry is answered in Article 36.

24. About speaking in the Congregation in such a tongue as the people understand

Original: It is a thing plainly repugnant to the Word of God, and the custom of the Primitive Church, to have publick Prayer in the Church, or to minister the Sacraments in a tongue not understanded of the people.

Simple English: It is clearly contrary to the word of God and to the custom of the ancient church to have public prayer in the church, or to minister the sacraments, in a language which the people do not understand.

In the Western church Latin was the common language until the late middle ages. It was the language of the educated classes. By the time of the Reformation ordinary people did not understand it. The result was that the liturgy and the Bible were not able to be understood by those who attended church. Martin Luther translated the Bible into German for his people, and in England the reformers gave the English church an English Bible and an English liturgy.  The Roman Church continued to use Latin for a long time afterwards.

The principle that public liturgy should be in the ordinary language of the people is still the teaching of the Anglican Church.

8. Concerning the Sacraments:   Articles 25-31

25. About the Sacraments

Original: Sacraments ordained of Christ be not only badges or tokens of Christian men's profession, but rather they be certain sure witnesses, and effectual signs of grace, and God's good will towards us, by the which he doth work invisibly in us, and doth not only quicken, but also strengthen and confirm our Faith in him.

There are two Sacraments ordained of Christ our Lord in the Gospel, that is to say, Baptism, and the Supper of the Lord.
Those five commonly called Sacraments, that is to say, Confirmation, Penance, Orders, Matrimony, and extreme Unction, are not to be counted for Sacraments of the Gospel, being such as have grown partly of the corrupt following of the Apostles, partly are states of life allowed in the Scriptures; but yet have not like nature of Sacraments with Baptism, and the Lord's Supper, for that they have not any visible sign or ceremony ordained of God.

The Sacraments were not ordained of Christ to be gazed upon, or to be carried about, but that we should duly use them. And in such only as worthily receive the same they have a wholesome effect or operation: but they that receive them unworthily purchase to themselves damnation, as Saint Paul saith.

Simple English: Sacraments ordained by Christ are not only badges or signs that a person claims to be a Christian. They are also reliable witnesses of God’s good will towards us, and signs which bring his grace to us. God works invisibly in us through the sacrament  not only to bring life to our faith, but also to strengthen our faith in him.

There are two sacraments Christ our Lord has commanded in the gospel: Baptism and the Lord’s Supper.
The five which are commonly called sacraments are not to be counted as sacraments of the gospel. These are confirmation, penance, ordination, marriage, and extreme unction (anointing with oil at the time of death). Some of these have developed because people have corrupted the teaching of the apostles. Some are just states of life allowed in the scriptures.  They are not like the sacraments of baptism and the Lord’s supper because they do not have any visible sign or ceremony appointed by God.

The sacraments were not given by Christ to be stared at or to be carried about. They were given so that we should use them. They only have a good effect for those who receive them in a worthy manner. Those who receive them in an unworthy way are buying  judgment for themselves, as Paul said.

The term sacrament means something that represents something else. John Chrysostom said it was seeing one thing and believing another. Augustine said one thing is seen and another is understood. The Anglican Catechism says it is “an outward and visible sign of an inward and spiritual grace”.  In the Middle Ages many ceremonies were thought of as sacraments.  Gradually only seven were considered as sacraments and these became the official sacraments of the Roman Catholic Church at the Council of Trent in 1547. The Article says there are only two sacraments of the gospel, ie sacraments ordained by Christ.

Only these two have a sign or ceremony ordained by God. The Article distinguishes the sacrament from the grace which the sacrament points to. The sacrament is the sign but it is not the same as the thing which the sign points to. The sacrament or sign is like a promise.

But the two sacraments of Christ are not only a sign. They are signs that bring with them the grace of God. They are signs of God’s good will toward us. Sacraments do not bring the grace that is promised automatically. The grace is not  contained in the sign. The sign or sacrament has to be received in the right way, that is, by faith.

The Article says that God works invisibly in us. This does not mean that the sacrament works invisibly. God does an invisible or spiritual work through the sacrament, because the sacrament brings a promise from God. The sign represents and reminds us of the promises of the gospel. It is like a visible word from God. When we recognize and believe what the sacrament is describing, our faith is strengthened.  In the sacrament God brings his promises to us in a visible form and we receive the promises by faith.

The Article rejects the practice of worshiping or venerating the sacraments, especially the Holy Communion.
The Article also rejects the idea that the sacraments contain grace, that is, that grace can be received just because we receive the outward sign. The Anglican church says the sacrament must be received in a worthy manner, that is by faith.

26. About the Unworthiness of the Ministers, which does not hinder the effect of the Sacrament

Original: Although in the visible Church the evil be ever mingled with the good, and sometimes the evil have chief authority in the Ministration of the Word and Sacraments, yet forasmuch as they do not the same in their own name, but in Christ's, and do minister by his commission and authority, we may use their ministry, both in hearing the Word of God, and in receiving of the Sacraments. Neither is the effect of Christ's ordinance taken away by their wickedness, nor the grace of God's gifts diminished from such as by faith and rightly do receive the Sacraments ministered unto them; which be effectual, because of Christ's institution and promise, although they be ministered by evil men.

Nevertheless, it appertaineth to the discipline of the Church, that inquiry be made of evil Ministers, and that they be accused by those that have knowledge of their offences; and finally being found guilty, by just judgement be deposed.

Simple English: In the visible Church the evil is always mixed with the good, and sometimes the evil has the chief authority in the ministry of the Word and Sacraments. Yet because they do not minister in their own name, but in Christ's, and because they minister by his commission and authority, we may use their ministry, both in hearing the Word of God, and in receiving the sacraments. The effect of what Christ instituted is not taken away by their wickedness, nor is the grace of God's gifts made less for those who by faith rightly receive the sacraments ministered to them. The sacraments have a good effect because of Christ's institution and promise, even though they are ministered by evil people.

Nevertheless, evil ministers should be investigated as part of the discipline of the Church. They should be accused by those who have knowledge of their offences, and when they are found guilty, they should be deposed justly.

The Article concerns a common problem in the visible church.  Some argue that we can only receive God’s grace through the sacraments and preaching if the minister is a good person. The Roman Church argued that the minister must intend to do the ministry according to the purpose of the church.  But it is not possible to know the heart or intention of a minister.
The Anglican Church says that the word and grace of God comes from God himself and is received by faith.  It does not depend on the person who administers it.

Nevertheless it is right that ministers should live holy lives and that evil ministers should be disciplined.

27. About Baptism

Original: Baptism is not only a sign of profession, and mark of difference, whereby Christian men are discerned from others that be not christened, but it is also a sign of Regeneration or new Birth, whereby, as by an instrument, they that receive Baptism rightly are grafted into the Church; the promises of forgiveness of sin, and of our adoption to be sons of God by the Holy Ghost, are visibly signed and sealed; Faith is confirmed, and Grace increased by virtue of prayer unto God. The Baptism of young Children is in any wise to be retained in the Church, as most agreeable with the institution of Christ.

Simple English: Baptism is not only a sign that shows that a person is a Christian and, which distinguishes Christians from those who are not baptised. It is also a sign of regeneration, or new birth. The sign of baptism is like an instrument so that those who receive baptism rightly are grafted into the church. The promises of forgiveness of sin and our adoption to be sons of God by the Holy Spirit are represented and made sure by the visible sign.  Faith is confirmed. Grace is increased because of prayer to God. The baptism of young children is to continue because it agrees with the sacrament Christ ordained.

The Anglican church baptises both adults and children.

Baptism does not make a person a Christian because of the ceremony.  Baptism is a sign  of God’s promise of forgiveness and new birth and when it is received by faith it becomes the public means by which a person joins the church.

Baptism strengthens our faith because it reminds us of the promises of the gospel. That is, it is about new birth, forgiveness, adoption, and being grafted into the church. God’s grace comes to us through this sacrament because we pray to God for these things, not because of the outward form of the ceremony, or because the grace of God is connected with the water.
The Anglican church teaches that the baptism of infants is consistent with the Bible’s teaching about baptism. The Article does not go so far as to say that children must be baptised, only that if they are, it is true baptism.

The faith exercised in infant baptism can be thought of as the faith of the child expressed through the faith of the parents.
For information about Confirmation see below

28. About the Lord's Supper

Original: The Supper of the Lord is not only a sign of the love that Christians ought to have among themselves one to another; but rather is a Sacrament of our Redemption by Christ's death: insomuch that to such as rightly, worthily, and with faith, receive the same, the Bread which we break is a partaking of the Body of Christ; and likewise the Cup of Blessing is a partaking of the Blood of Christ.

Transubstantiation (or the change of the substance of Bread and Wine) in the Supper of the Lord, cannot be proved by Holy Writ; but is repugnant to the plain words of Scripture, overthroweth the nature of a Sacrament, and hath given occasion to many superstitions.

The Body of Christ is given, taken and eaten in the Supper, only after an heavenly and spiritual manner. And the mean whereby the Body of Christ is received and eaten in the Supper is Faith. The Sacrament of the Lord's Supper was not by Christ's ordinance reserved, carried about, lifted up or worshipped.

Simple English: The Supper of the Lord is not only a sign of the love that Christians ought to have to one another; it is also a sacrament of our redemption by Christ’s death. If we receive the sacrament with faith and in a worthy manner,  the bread which we break is a sharing in the body of Christ; and the cup of blessing is a sharing in the blood of Christ.

Transubstantiation (or the change of the substance of bread and wine) in the Supper of the Lord cannot be proved by holy scripture but is rejected by the plain words of scripture, contradicts the nature of a sacrament, and has produced many superstitions.

The body of Christ is given, taken, and eaten in the supper only in a spiritual manner. It is received and eaten by faith. The sacrament of the Lord’s Supper was not ordered by Christ to be reserved, lifted up, carried about or worshipped.

The Book of Common Prayer titled this service “The Order of the Administration of the Lord’s Supper or Holy Communion.”  The Roman Catholic church calls it the Mass.  Some Anglicans call it the Eucharist (from a Greek word meaning thanksgiving).
This Article, like the one about Baptism, refers to the sign. The Lord’ Supper is a sign of Christian love, and of our redemption. Another way to say this is that the bread and cup are a means by which we have a share in the death of Jesus.

The sign reminds us both of the death of Jesus and of what it means. When we receive the sign, then we are able, by faith, to receive the promise of redemption which the sign points to. However the Article also states the social aspect of the sacrament. It is a sign of the fellowship and love shared by those who gather around the same table as the Lord.

Anglicans believe that the bread and wine does not change during the Holy Communion service. The bread and wine are signs of the body and blood of Christ. They represent God’s forgiveness and the eternal life that results from his death. 
The doctrine of transubstantiation contradicts the nature of a sacrament because it teaches that the sign is the same as the thing signified.  According to the last rubric in the service of Holy Communion, the body and blood of Christ are not physically present because they are in heaven.

That is why, in the Holy Communion service, the body of Christ is received only in a spiritual  manner, only by faith.
In the Service of Communion for the Sick, in the Book of Common Prayer, it is stated that if a sick person is unable to receive the sacrament by mouth, they are still able to eat and drink the body and blood of the Lord if they repent and believe and give thanks for Christ’s redemption, ie they eat and drink by faith.

The Article also says that the sacrament must not be kept after the service has finished. The reason is so that it will not be worshiped.

29. About the Wicked which do not eat the Body of Christ in the use of the Lord's Supper

Original: The Wicked and such as be void of a lively faith, although they do carnally and visibly press with their teeth (as Saint Augustine saith) the Sacrament of the Body and Blood of Christ, yet in no wise are they partakers of Christ: but rather, to their condemnation, do eat and drink the sign or Sacrament of so great a thing.

Simple English: The wicked, and those who do not have a living faith, can physically and visibly press with their teeth (as Saint Augustine says) the sacrament of the Body and Blood of Christ. But they cannot share in Christ. Rather, to their condemnation, they eat and drink the sign or sacrament of such a great thing.

This Article was included to distinguish Anglican teaching from that of the Lutheran church. It clarifies the teaching of Article 28 about whether Christ is actually present in the sacrament. The Anglican Church denies that the prayer of consecration brings the presence of Christ into or alongside the sacrament.  This means that an unbeliever who eats the bread does not receive Christ or his benefits, because neither Christ nor his benefits are contained in the sacrament, they are only conveyed as a promise to the believer by means of the sacrament.

30. About both kinds

Original: The Cup of the Lord is not to be denied to the Lay-people: for both the parts of the Lord's Sacrament, by Christ's ordinance and commandment, ought to be ministered to all Christian men alike.

Simple English: The Cup of the Lord is not to be denied to the lay people. For both the parts of the Lord's Sacrament, by Christ's ordinance and commandment, ought to be ministered to all Christians alike.

This Article concerns a practice of the Roman Catholic church to give only the bread in Communion to lay people. This practice developed from about the 12th century.  Some such as Thomas Aquinas said it was because of the danger of spilling the blood of Christ. The Council of Trent, in 1562, said that it was not necessary to give the cup because Christ was completely received in the bread. The Roman Church also claimed the authority to change the traditional practice.

The Anglican Article, says that the command of Christ is the reason to give both bread and wine to all Christians.

31. About the Oblation of Christ finished upon the Cross

Original: The offering of Christ once made is that perfect redemption, propitiation, and satisfaction, for all the sins of the whole world, both original and actual; and there is none other satisfaction for sin, but that alone. Wherefore the sacrifices of Masses, in the which it was commonly said, that the Priest did offer Christ for the quick and the dead, to have remission of pain or guilt, were blasphemous fables, and dangerous deceits.

Simple English: The offering of Christ made once is the perfect redemption, propitiation, and satisfaction, for all the sins of the whole world, both original and actual.  And there is no other satisfaction for sin, but only that. Therefore it is a blasphemous fable and a dangerous deceit to say that the priest offers Christ in the sacrifices of the mass so that the living and the dead can have forgiveness of punishment or guilt.

The Anglican teaching about the death of Christ is also referred to in Articles 2,3,15, and 28.
This Article affirms that the sacrifice of Christ was made only once, and that it was a sacrifice for all sins. Therefore no other sacrifices or offerings are necessary, and no other sins need to be atoned for.

The Article rejects the teaching that the Holy Communion is an offering again of the sacrifice of Christ. It also rejects the idea that such an offering is either needed or possible.

The background to this, at the time of the Reformation, was the practice of saying masses for the dead so that they could spend less time in purgatory.  The idea that the Mass was a sacrifice of Christ was also linked to the doctrine of transubstantiation.

This is one reason the Book of Common Prayer did not use the term Altar for the Lord’s Table. The Holy Communion service also used the phrase “a sacrifice of praise and thanksgiving”  to make clear that the Holy Communion is not a sacrifice in any other sense.

9. Concerning Church Discipline:    Articles 32-36

32. About the Marriage of Priests

Original: Bishops, Priests and Deacons are not commanded by God's Law, either to vow the estate of single life, or to abstain from marriage: therefore it is lawful for them, as for all other Christian men, to mary at their own discretion, as they shall judge the same to serve better to godliness.

Simple English: Bishops, Priests and Deacons are not commanded by God's law to promise to remain single, or to abstain from marriage. Therefore it is lawful for them, as for all other Christians, to marry at their own discretion. They must judge which will contribute better to godliness.

From the time of the Middle Ages celibacy for bishops and priests had become the rule in the Western Church. Before that there were many who believed it was the best way of life for those ministers.  It was introduced into England in the 12th century. However it was not possible to enforce it, and many clergy were either married or lived with a woman who was not legally their wife. The Council of Trent in 1563 restated the Catholic position that priests were not to marry.

This Article states the biblical position and allows clergy to marry at their own discretion.

33. About excommunicate Persons, how they are to be avoided

Original: That person which by open denunciation of the Church is rightly cut off from the unity of the Church, and excommunicated, ought to be taken of the whole multitude of the faithful, as an Heathen and Publican, until he be openly reconciled by penance and received into the Church by a Judge that hath authority thereunto.

Simple English: A person can be cut off, in a just way, from the unity of the Church. They are excommunicated by the Church’s public condemnation. Such a person ought to be regarded by the whole multitude of the faithful as an unbeliever and sinner, until they are publicly reconciled by repentance and received into the Church by a person who has authority to receive them.

This Article concerns church discipline. It says that the church has the right to  separate people from the fellowship of the visible church.  The excommunication must be done publicly. The Holy Communion service of the Book of Common Prayer states that excommunications should be read out after the Nicene Creed is said.  The order for the Burial of the Dead is not to be used for excommunicate persons according to the Book of Common Prayer.  The church does not have the power of the state over people’s lives, so others are to treat people who have been excommunicated as though they were an unbeliever. This would have greater power in a stable village community. The hope is that the person will repent and be restored. The Article does not state the reasons why a person could be excommunicated, but  most churches have rules about this.

34. About the Traditions of the Church

Original: It is not necessary that Traditions and Ceremonies be in all places one, and utterly like; for at all times theca have been divers. and may be changed according to the diversities of countries, times, and men's manners, so that nothing be ordained against God's Word. Whosoever through his private judgement, willingly and purposely, cloth openly break the traditions and ceremonies of the Church, which be not repugnant to the Word of God, and be ordained and approved by common authority, ought to be rebuked openly. (that others may fear to do the like,) as he that offendeth against the common order of the Church, and hurteth the authority of the Magistrate, and woundeth the consciences of the weak brethren.
Every particular or national Church hath authority to ordain, change, and abolish, ceremonies or rites of the Church ordained only by man's authority, so that all things be done to edifying.

Simple English: It is not necessary that Traditions and Ceremonies are the same in every place. They have always been different. They may be changed for different countries, times, and cultures, as long as nothing is ordained against God's Word.  Anyone who, because of his private opinion, purposely and openly breaks the traditions and ceremonies of the Church, which are not against the Word of God, and are approved by common authority, ought to be rebuked openly (so that others may fear to do the same). This is an offence against the common order of the Church, which hurts the authority of the government, and wounds the consciences of the weak.
Every national Church has authority to ordain, change, and abolish, ceremonies of the Church which are ordained only by human authority, so that everything results in edifying.

This Article is related to Article 20.  At the time of the Reformation it stated the view of the Church of England over against that of the Roman Catholic Church which claimed to have authority over all churches in every country.

The Article also stated the view of the Church of England over against the individualism  of some of the Protestant groups.
The authority of national churches to make decisions about ceremonies is limited by the scriptures and by the principle of what is edifying.

35. About the Homilies

Original: The second Book of Homilies, the several titles whereof we have joined under this Article, doth contain a godly and wholesome Doctrine, and necessary for these times, as doth the former Book of Homilies, which were set forth in the time of Edward the Sixth; and therefore we judge them to be read in Churches by the Ministers, diligently and distinctly, that they may be understanded of the people.

Simple English: The second Book of Homilies contains doctrine which is godly, wholesome, and necessary for these times, as does the first Book of Homilies also, which was set forth in the time of Edward the Sixth. Therefore we consider them appropriate to be read in churches by the ministers, carefully and distinctly, so that the people may understand them.  The different titles of the homilies in the second book are listed below.

1. Of the right Use of the Church
2. Against peril of Idolatry
3. Of repairing and keeping clean of Churches
4. Of good Works: first of Fasting
5. Against Gluttony and Drunkenness
6. Against Excess of Apparel
7. Of Prayer
8. Of the Place and Time of Prayer
9. That Common Prayer and Sacraments ought to be ministered in a known tongue
10. Of the reverend estimation of God's Word  
11. Of Alms-doing
12. Of the Nativity of Christ
13. Of the Passion of Christ
14. Of the Resurrection of Christ
15. Of the worthy receiving of the Sacrament of the Body and Blood of Christ
16. Of the Gifts of the Holy Ghost
17. For the days of Rogation Week
18. Of the State of Matrimony
19. Of Repentance
20. Against Idleness
21. Against Rebellion

A homily is a sermon.  The First Book of Homilies was published in 1547. Most of the sermons were probably by Archbishop Cramer and some by Bishop Ridley. Ministers  were ordered to read them as the sermon on Sundays. The Second Book was published in 1562 (although the homily about Rebellion was added in 1571 after a rebellion in the north of England in 1569).  Many of these were probably by Bishop Jewel.

The purpose of the Homilies was to provide good teaching to the congregations. The reason this was needed was that some clergy were not well educated,  and others still believed the Roman Catholic teaching.

You can read the Homilies here.

36. About the Consecration of Bishops and Ministers

Original: The Book of Consecration of Archbishops and Bishops, and Ordering of Priests and Deacons, lately set forth in the tine of Edward the Sixth, and confirmed at the same time by authority of Parliament, doth contain all things necessary to such Consecration and Ordering: neither hath it any thing, that of itself is superstitious and ungodly. And therefore whosoever are consecrated or ordered according to the Rites of that Book, since the second year of the forenamed King Edward unto this time, or hereafter shall be consecrated or ordered according to the same Rites; we decree all such to be rightly, orderly, and lawfully consecrated and ordered.

Simple English: The Book of Consecration of Archbishops and Bishops, and Ordering of Priests and Deacons, was set forth in the time of Edward the Sixth, and confirmed at the same time by authority of Parliament. It contains everything necessary to such Consecration and Ordering.  It does not contain anything that is superstitious and ungodly. And therefore everyone who is consecrated or ordered according to the rites of that Book, since the second year of King Edward until this time or afterwards, is rightly and lawfully consecrated and ordered.

The Article is related to Article 23, and concerns the validity of ordinations using the Ordination service of 1549 and the revised service of 1552. After the death of Edward VI, Queen Mary had repealed all the changes which had been introduced during Edward’s reign. When Elizabeth I became Queen she restored the Prayer Book of 1552 as part of her 1559 Settlement. However there was some confusion as to whether the Ordination Services were intended to be included since the Ordination Services were not part of the Prayer Book.  In 1563 this Article was included so as to make clear that all ordinations since the time of Edward were valid.

The Article also says that the Ordination Services do not lack anything that is needed to make an ordination valid. They are also godly and not superstitious, a response to objections from some Puritans.

The Article also refers to the three orders of ministers in the Anglican church. One of the things which characterises the Anglican Church is the way it organises its ministers. Anglicans have three orders: bishops, priests and deacons.  You can read more about the Orders of Ministry here.

10. Concerning Church and State Articles 37-39

37. About the Civil Magistrates

Original: The King's Majesty hath the chief power in this Realm of England, and other his Dominions, unto whom the chief Government of all Estates of this Realm, whether they be Ecclesiastical or Civil, in all causes doth appertain, and is not, nor ought to be, subject to any foreign jurisdiction.

Where we attribute to the King's Majesty the chief government, by which Titles we understand the minds of some slanderous folks to be offended; we give not to our Princes the ministering either of God's Word, or of the Sacraments, the which thing the Injunctions also lately set forth by Elizabeth our Queen do most plainly testify; but that only prerogative, which we see to have been given always to all godly Princes in Holy Scriptures by God himself; that is, that they should rule all estates and degrees committed to their charge by God, whether they be Ecclesiastical or Temporal, and restrain with the civil sword the stubborn and evildoers.

The Bishop of Rome hath no jurisdiction in this Realm of England.

The Laws of the Realm may punish Christian men with death, for heinous and grievous offences. It is lawful for Christian men, at the commandment of the Magistrate, to wear weapons, and serve in the wars.

Simple English:The King's Majesty has the chief power in this Realm of England and his other dominions. The chief government of all aspects of this realm, including both ecclesiastical and civil, belongs to him. The government is not, nor ought to be, subject to any foreign jurisdiction.

Some slanderous people are offended when we attribute to the King's Majesty the highest government. But we do not give to our Princes the ministering either of God's Word, or of the Sacraments. The Injunctions recently set forth by Elizabeth our Queen plainly testify to this. We only give that right, which we see in the Holy Scriptures was always given to godly Princes by God himself. That is, that they should rule all positions and classes committed to their charge by God, whether they are ecclesiastical or civil. And that they should restrain with the civil sword the stubborn and evildoers.

The Bishop of Rome has no jurisdiction in this Realm of England.

The Laws of the Realm may punish Christians with death, for terrible and serious offences. It is lawful for Christians, at the commandment of the Ruler to carry weapons and serve in the wars.

This Article is about four matters.
One of them concerns the Royal Supremacy. This means that the King or Queen of England is the highest authority in the country. In 1553 the earlier version of this article said that the King was the supreme head of the Church of England (according to an Act of Parliament in 1534), but Queen Elizabeth said that only Christ was the head of the church so the words were changed to “chief government” in 1563.

One purpose of making the King the chief governor was to remove the authority of the Pope. The authority of the King over the church is limited by Article 20 which gave the church the authority to decide about ceremonies and matters of faith. This Article also says that the Ruler does not have authority to minister the Word of God or the sacraments. The Article affirms that the King only has the authority which the Bible says all rulers have.

The second thing this Article clarifies is that the bishop of Rome has no jurisdiction in England. Before the time of Henry VIII the Pope had claimed authority over all nations and churches. This idea was developed by Pope Gregory VII in the 11th century. The rejection of papal power was related to Henry’s desire for a divorce. The Act of Supremacy (1534) had been preceded by the Act in Restraint of Appeals (1533) which prevented people in England from appealing to the Pope as a higher court of law. This Article affirms the independence of the Church of England.

The third matter concerns capital punishment and affirms that the death penalty is permissible. This is not the same as to say it is recommended.

The fourth matter concerns military service. An earlier version of this Article referred to “lawful (or just) wars”. This Article says that the wars must be commanded by the Ruler, and is probably opposing the views of some Anabaptists who were opposed to all wars.

38. About Christian's Goods, which are not common

Original: The Riches and Goods of Christians are not common, as touching the right, title, and possession of the same, as certain Anabaptists do falsely boast. Notwithstanding, every man ought, of such things as he possesseth, liberally to give alms to the poor, according to his ability.

Simple English: The wealth and goods of Christians are not common, regarding their right, title, and possession, as certain Anabaptists falsely claim. Nevertheless, everyone ought to give generously to the poor from what they have and according to their ability.

At the time of the Reformation some members of the Anabaptist groups wanted to abolish all law, and make all property common to everyone. They said that all Christians were completely equal. This Article denies this.

The Article also states the biblical principles of giving, that is: giving generously; giving to the poor; giving from what one has and not from what one does not have; and giving according to one’s ability (see 2 Cor 8 and 9).

39. About a Christian's Oath

Original: As we confess that vain and rash Swearing is forbidden Christian men by our Lord Jesus Christ, and James his Apostle, so we judge, that Christian Religion doth not prohibit, but that a man may swear when the Magistrate requireth, in a cause of faith and charity, so it be done according to the Prophet's teaching, in justice, judgement, and truth.

Simple English: We admit that empty and foolish swearing is forbidden Christians by our Lord Jesus Christ and James his apostle. But we consider that the Christian religion does not prohibit a person from swearing when the Ruler requires it. In a cause of faith and love, it should be done according to the prophet's teaching, in justice, judgment, and truth.

This Article is also opposing the opinions of some Anabaptists at the time of the Reformation.  The Article distinguishes swearing which is either rude or intended to mislead, from swearing to make a solemn statement of the truth. The prophet is probably Jeremiah (Jer 4.2).

 

A Brief History of the Development of the Three-Fold Ministry

The Apostles were the first ministers appointed by Christ. They in turn appointed seven men to supervise the distribution of food in Jerusalem (Acts 6). Later elders were appointed in the churches.  The letters to Timothy refer to deacons, overseers (bishops) and elders (presbyters).

It seems that the elders and overseers were a single group in the beginning. But by the end of the 2nd century one of the elders in each place had become the chief leader and was called the bishop.

After the Roman Emperor Constantine became a Christian in 313, churches multiplied and elders became the sole leaders of local churches and one of them, who was called the bishop, became the leader of a group of churches (known as a diocese).

As the church spread major cities became the centre for a bishop who had oversight over other bishops (eg Antioch, Alexandria, Rome, Constantinople etc).  In the western church the bishop of Rome gradually gained power over other bishops.

The Eastern church rejected the authority of the bishop of Rome. It continues to be led by Patriarchs. At the Reformation the Church of England rejected the authority of the bishop of Rome also.  Other reformed churches such as the Presbyterian did not have bishops. Instead they had a form of government based on the authority of elders.

The Role of the Ministers in the Anglican Church
The Deacon:

Is ordained to assist the priest in the work of the parish. This can include teaching as well as looking after the sick and needy in the parish. Normally a person is not ordained priest until they have been a deacon for a year.  However some people remain as deacons and are not ordained as priests.  They have a calling to serve as helpers in the church.

The Priest:

In English this term comes from the Greek word presbyter which means elder.  The Anglican priest is not a priest who offers sacrifices like the Old Testament priests did. He does not offer a sacrifice in the Communion service as a Roman Catholic priest claims to.  The Anglican priest is ordained to a ministry of the Word and sacraments. They must bring the people in the parish to an understanding of God’s word and to maturity in Christ, so that there is no error in their religion nor bad behaviour.

In the service of Ordering of Priests in the Book of Common Prayer, the bishop says to the newly ordained person, “Take authority to preach the Word of God and to minister the holy sacraments in the congregation where you will be … appointed.”

The Bishop:

The Bishop is ordained to teach true doctrine and correct error. The bishop is to ordain priests and deacons and to watch over the health of the church. The bishop is the leader of a diocese.

Return to Article 36

Confirmation in the Anglican Church

When children are baptised the parents and godparents make promises for the children that they will follow Christ until the child is old enough to take the promises on themselves.  Confirmation is the time when the person is able to ratify those promises for themselves. It is a public declaration that the person is a follower of Christ and is committed to serving him for the rest of their life.

When a person is baptised as an adult they should be confirmed at the same time or as soon after as is possible. In the Confirmation service the church prays for the person and the Bishop prays and lays hands on them so that they will be strengthened with the Holy Spirit. The strengthening with the Holy Spirit is so that they can serve Christ in a godly way and remain faithful to him.

The Book of Common Prayer said that no one could take part in the Holy Communion until they were confirmed, or ready and willing to be confirmed.  Nowadays many Anglican churches allow children who are baptised to be admitted to the Holy Communion before they have been confirmed.
Return to Article 27

The Apocrypha and the Canon

If the Bible is the main test of knowing what is orthodox Christianity, how do we know which books should be included in the Bible? In bookshops today you can buy a Bible which includes the Apocrypha. Bookshops also sell other books such as the Didache or the Epistle of Barnabas which some claim should be in our Bibles. Who decided, and on what grounds?

The Apocrypha is a group of writings that were once attached to the Old Testament. Before the time of Christ they were often found in collections of the Greek translation of the Old Testament (the Septuagint or LXX) and formed part of the collection of sacred writings of Greek speaking Jews. They were generally not known in the Hebrew Bible. By 90AD a Jewish Council meeting at Jamnia rejected them from the list of books regarded as authoritative, although they were regarded as useful for private study.

The Christian church took over the same collection of Hebrew scriptures that the Council of Jamnia had agreed to (because they were the scriptures that were generally accepted).

The Christians took some time to agree which of their own writings should be considered authoritative (the gospel of John, for example, took a long time to be generally accepted). By the mid 2nd century Irenaeus of Lyons and Hippolytus of Rome both mention most of the NT books in our Bible.

But it is not until the Easter letter of Athanasius of Alexandria in 367 that we have a defined list of the same books that are now in our Bible.  The Western Church at the Council of Carthage in 397 listed the same NT books.

There were three main bases on which decisions were made for the NT books. That the book was written by an apostle or came from the teaching of an apostle; that the doctrine was apostolic; and that it had been generally used and accepted in the church from the time of the apostles.

On this basis writings from the second century, such as the Didache, were omitted from the NT Canon. “Canon”, in this context, means a rule and in this case it means the agreed list of books which were ruled to be authoritative in the church.
At the time of the Reformation the Roman Catholic Council of Trent, in 1546, ruled that the 12 books of the OT apocrypha should be included in the canon of the Bible. That is why they are printed in Catholic bibles.

The Church of England (in Article 6 of the 39 Articles) listed the same 24 books as were in the Hebrew Canon but said that the Apocrypha was only read for example of life and not to establish any doctrine. The other protestant churches kept the original list, even though Luther did not think James should have been included.

The Eastern Church in 1672 added four of the books of the Apocrypha to its Canon, however in practice it tends towards the Protestant Bible. The Anglican church believes that the scriptures in our Bible “contain all things necessary for salvation.”

Return to Article 6

­